It is difficult to see Airbus and some of the other large, institutional space companies in Europe banding together and becoming nimble and more efficient operators in spaceflight. That would require enormous changes in companies that have decades of ossified culture, with layers of management that are difficult to cut through.

  • vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    On the one hand, it’s euro-ULA. On the other hand, I’m not sure there’s an obvious alternative.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Why not invest in a bunch of the smaller companies like Rocket Factory Ausburg, PLD Space, MaiaSpace, HyImpulse, etc? They won’t all be successful, but if just a couple of them are, the competition would put Europe in a much stronger position than if they were to establish Euro-ULA.

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m not sure we can afford an “either or” strategy.

        We should be doing that, we should be doing euro-ULA, and we should be massively expanding (access to) launch infrastructure. There’s only so much you can do when your ranges are literally on the other side of the planet.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          There’s only so much you can do when your ranges are literally on the other side of the planet.

          Is suppose French Guiana is a bit far, but Andøya, Esrange, and Saxavord all have plans for orbital launches, don’t they?