• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s only controversial if you were misled. If it’s just $30 for a different colored TP, then it’s just bad business and if anyone bought it, foolish consumers.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It still cracks me up when I see quotes of reddit users in a random thread (taken as a newsworthy story, lol). It makes me wonder how far it can go with obscene usernames. Imagine having a good breakdown of a problem posted by someone called AnalNosferatu69 that you just can’t quote.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve been boycotting Blizzard since the bNetD lawsuit & haven’t regretted my decision yet.

    The level of contempt they have for their players is amazing.

    • Drewski@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      For me it was when they banned Blitzchung from a Hearthstone tournament and took away his prize money for supporting Hong Kong freedom. I haven’t regretted it since they don’t make good games anymore like they did when I was growing up.

  • Defaced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Simple solution, ditch diablo 4 and play last epoch instead. D4 is a fucking disgrace of a game.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    If people stopped paying ridiculous prices for cosmetic shit like this maybe we could see reasonable prices like $1 recolours of things. There’s absolutely no reason changing the colour of something should cost $30 other than the fact that people fucking pay for it, and it means other more sensible dollar-conscious players get priced out of the fun little things like that.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Addicted people with poor self-control are abused in these kind of microtransactions. This should be illegal.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh well, the market clearly accepts paid cosmetics. It sucks for people who don’t spend money on it like me but at the end of the day people will blow cash on it and that’s why it keeps getting up charged.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        If it didn’t cost anything they wouldn’t do it at all. You already paid for it, they have your money. They do the extra stuff to try and squeeze out more money.

          • folkrav@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            They couldn’t charge for it, cause games were mostly offline. In this era of always-online stuff… People pay for it. Not the majority, but there are enough whales to cover for everyone, apparently… So companies do it. Gaming has become an industry. It’s not run by passionate developers anymore, but by investors. Why would they not charge for it in this time and age? There is literally no incentive, from their perspective of “we’re selling a product”.

  • Brocon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Or you could get Last Epoch. And maybe start enjoy playing an ARPG again in the process.

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean, it is just a cosmetic, so don’t buy it.

    If they’re doing this with things that affect gameplay then that’s absolutely not alright, but I don’t see the issue with cosmetics.

    As long as idiots buy this crap they’re gonna keep making it.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Once upon a time, I would’ve agreed with you… until I heard that Epic Games got in trouble for trying to create a culture in Fortnite that shames and bullies kids for using the default skins. The advertising around cosmetics is as psychologically exploitative as battle passes and the like, and though they lack the same addictive qualities as lootboxes, they prey upon the same people - namely, kids and those with mental health issues that make fiscal responsibility difficult, like ADHD.

      Plus, Blizzard has a history of making in-store items higher quality than what you’d find in the game, so it does affect gameplay in the sense that you get lower quality stuff in the game as a result. Plus, look at what they did with the original Overwatch skins being paywalled when they forced people to switch to Overwatch 2. Blizzard deserves no benefit of the doubt here.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      When they make low effort cosmetics they are both restricting features that could be in the game and incentivizing themselves to prohibit a modding community that adds a ton to games for free.

  • Pohl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    You never know how other people value their money. Some people buy a $3500 AR headset. Some people buy a truck that costs more than they make in a year. Some people pay 30USD to make the portals a different color.

    I have NEVER bough a cosmetic item in a game, I truly do not understand people who do. But, people love that shit so who am I to say it shouldn’t be available to them?

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m someone who can’t find a game without dollar signs in it anymore because these idiots are reinforcing shitty practices. Fuck them all.

      • Pohl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Modern games cost WAY too much to make and the industry has come up with the worst possible way to solve that problem. If you want to make a single player game with modern graphics that sells for 70$ and has a few 30$ dlcs, it HAS to be a huge hit or your going out of business. There are very few studios left with the guts and confidence to make that sort of wild “all-in” bet.

        The worst part is that games production costs are almost all labor cost so making games cheaper means making games with less people. There is no worker friendly future for games but free to play cash grab skinner boxes.

        Making art with 100s of millions in budget requires a hell of a patron. There is no market way to get the Sistine Chapel.