• Large Bullfrog@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    In the rare instances that the lib you are talking to truly doesn’t know any better and is only a lib because of upbringing/political illiteracy it can be, depending on how constructively you go about it. If you are arguing with a clear turbolib then no that isn’t praxis.

    • davel@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Not to oversell the utility of arguing with libs, but usually it’s the bystanders who get something out of the conversation, not the lib you’re conversing with directly. There’s no point in conversing in old posts, and little point in continuing a conversation beyond the “X more replies →” fold, because there’s usually no audience.

    • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I would contend that publicly shaming/humiliating unrepentant libs for the sake of highlighting their flaws to libs more on the fence could be considered praxis. I’m curious to see if others might agree with that sentiment.

      • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        There are a lot more lurkers on any forum than active members who comment. Everyone here has read a thousand more posts/comments than they’ve made. Getting lurkers to consider what you say is a very real thing, and people do change their political beliefs based on what they read online.