• unautrenom@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nonetheless, experts expect the final agreement to be revealed by the end of March as the Parliament is pushing to close all the open legislative processes before the upcoming European elections scheduled in June.

    So basically, the law’s unlikely to change much before being pushed to vote, which considering how stupid it is, it’s likely to be outright rejected like Chat Control by the Parliement.

    Still, it’s good to raise awareness on the issue.

  • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    " Techradar " is not the best source for legislative journalism, and one could question their credibility about product reviews. Check trustpilot for example; 1 /5 rating.

    • Sylocule@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, that was different. eIDAS is certificate based - those that care will just use a VPN to download a non-EU compliant browser build and only surf with the VPN on. At least that’s my plan.

        • Sylocule@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          But it’s not spyware. The eIDAS law proposes that governments can insert certificates that spoof the originator. A subtle difference.

          I really hope Mozilla don’t comply

            • aelwero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              No… That’s spyware with less steps… Theres no cracking, hacking, Trojans etc. involved at all, it’s a direct and straightforward addition of the spyware under color of the states authority.

          • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Still weakening encryption standards.

            It would force the inclusion of a “trusted root” into browsers & OSs with the purpose of allowing government entities to spoof certificates. As certificate pinning is becoming mainstream, I would assume it’ll require browser & app vendors to weaken those controls too.

            You’d hope ECHR’s prior ruling would block this too. For the exact same rationale.

        • Sylocule@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m expecting browser companies to offer EU citizens a browser with the eIDAS cert acceptance baked in but outside the EU as they are now