• Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Boston dynamics absolutely sucks for licenses, you have to renew that shit every year for “a couple of grand”. No sane military would go for that deal - to spend money that’s worth what is basically a luxurious car is, to then have to spend more money to renew it, for a technology that isn’t all that useful or practical.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        What makes you think they wouldnt make special deal with the military. They immediately allowed them to be used for police surveillance… The whole no military use thing was just for appearences from the start.

    • lunar17@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nothing. Read the article (it’s not long); these robots are from a different company.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        a different company

        Looks like some brand new start-up shell called Austin Rynamics. Any similarities are completely coincidental. Now stop bringing it up. I said good day, sir!

  • Technotica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    We didn’t get hover cars, personal jetpacks, high speed personal tube travel systems, moon bases or mars terraforming.

    But we do have robot dogs, electronic cigarettes, lying AI and the ability to kill people remotely by dropping grenades on their heads from almost invisible micro aircraft.