Man I thought you knew that algebra was all razzmatazz!

“Google it” is not an acceptable answer you’re better off just not commenting.

insert vague appeal to the law and everyone gets a fair shot as if that has literally anything to do with facilitating a slush fund for the political pariahs rallying around a kid who traveled across state lines to kill progressives

If you think these fundraising efforts are what are standing between his having a quality defense and not I don’t know what to tell you other than go actually read about these people.

Agreed

Yes. They put it up because everyone is reading it and seething and sharing it and talking about it.

Are you not familiar with how media operates? It’s often a cynical business reflecting only one thing: they like money.

Opinion piece, folks. The NYT is a boot licking rag but opinion pieces are the opinion of the individual writer, sometimes someone not even associated with the paper. I’ve seen wild shit go up there that they’d never agree with.

deleted by creator

Yes! It is good to be ethical! How is that controversial?

Also you literally know nothing of my politics other than I think Kyle Rittenhouse is a bad person and facilitating him makes donors bad too. Don’t call me a liberal just because you have an axe to grind and want to lump people you disagree with into your simplistic idea of a boogie man group.

Know what this article doesn’t tell us? How much they break off for themselves, let alone the massive PR boost they get.

These fucks helped Kyle Rittenhouse. I don’t give a shit that they appeal to this ridiculous 2012 libertarian fuckboi idea of “hur dur we are equal opportunity for everyone!” They’ve been on the wrong side of history many, many times. Yay congrats you got it right this time arguably! Not good enough tbh.

I’m sure Gab and truth social platformed some good people too.

Everything in the US can be boiled down to “I completely and unequivocally own all space with a 5sqft area.” Transportation, covid behavior, airplanes, you name it.

Our “rugged individualism” is really just an unmatched sense of entitlement.

I’m assuming this is a joke considering Apple dropped that mouse many years ago lol

Only if Nightmare Before Christmas is a Christmas movie too

Interesting I would think that would be more tied to smart phone usage as opposed to specific operating systems but I guess that’s not the case

Yeah tinkering with my Mac is what got me over to Linux as well. Yeah with Macs some things are locked down or a little tricky to find, but with windows nothing makes any sense to me and I feel like I’m constantly fighting it.

Mac users really struggle to understand the concept of local files without being shown

Of all the critiques of Mac users’ computer literacy I’ve seen this doesn’t even seem to me like it’d make the list.

To be clear I am not saying you are wrong or don’t know what you’re talking about or something. I am just genuinely surprised to see that and I’m curious what you mean. I assume I’m just unaware of the issue.

Definitely part of the model, so it’s all good

Well at least you’re honest about your twisted view. No debating you out of that weird position.

lol love it

No if it was then debates on what constitutes “speech” or “harm” wouldn’t occur.

People can AI generate convincing CP images. Should those be allowed? Who was actively harmed? What about animation?

I didn’t say who individually to kill I’m just saying people should go kill a certain group. Should that be allowed? Who was actively harmed? I can’t be held accountable for actions of randos who take my jokes and sarcastic comments literally!