LOL.

We pay for 4K, but we don’t get more than 720p unless we use some proprietary shit hardware and agree to their super-invasive “privacy policy” - and they expect people to NOT set sail in the high seas? GTFO…

  • VR20X6@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    If that’s true on its face, then you’re not losing any money either way since they are never going to pay regardless even if you try to force them to.

    Meanwhile, you can absolutely scare away what could have been a paying customer by offering dogshit service.

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s never been an assumption you can make.

      If you hand me a $10 version of a thing or a $5 option of the exact same thing, I’m taking the $5. Free is no different. Especially when they can do it from the comfort of their home and not drive to a mall to buy the CD or whatever. Remember what year it was when this all started man.

      • VR20X6@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Remember what year it was when this all started man.

        1903 when Edison v. Lubin was filed?

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you’re going to be a smartass then I have no desire to continue this conversation. I am talking about when piracy became mainstream via napster because it became easy for people to get free music.