• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    18 天前

    Stop talking about the data, start talking about the political interference. There’s a reason Trump is against the ban now.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 天前

    My data will be stolen no matter which corporation I go with. Frankly, I don’t care which government they’re under. Hell, if I lived in Texas, I’d have to worry if I talked about driving a friend out of state to get an abortion. China wouldn’t care.

  • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 天前

    Now, what if end-user applications were forced to be open and audited, so everyone can know exactly what the app is and isn’t doing for China - or America - and not individually choose and make laws based on that.

    No, transparency is too terrifying to techno-capitalism.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 天前

        Sure, but in this case you aren’t choosing between “blinds” and “no blinds”

        You’re choosing who gets peak in your windows. It’s either going to be the US or China, and quite frankly, I’m far more afraid of the US because I live here. The US can actually use my data against me. China almost certainly can’t.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 天前

      Suppress stories about Tiben, Hongkong, the Uyghurs, Taiwan… Hey, whatever happened to Gedhun Choekyi Nyima?

  • Ascrod@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 天前

    I wonder if the forces behind the ban blame TikTok for the Pro-Palestinian bent of the younger generations.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 天前

      I’m confident that this is an element of things, even if indirectly. It’s been interesting to see the finely tuned, Hasbara propaganda machine become unstable. TikTok has definitely been a component of that

  • takeda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    18 天前

    The whole idea about forcing TikTok to be sold, is that right now TikTok doesn’t have to obey any laws.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 天前

      Who is out there saying this? That’s ridiculous. Are foreign people exempt from our laws when they visit? No? Then why would you believe foreign companies are exempt?

          • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 天前

            TikTok app merely being operational in the US is not presence. Implying that would be as ridiculous as giving a country jurisdiction over you becaues you sent a letter there.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 天前

              It absolutely is presence. Otherwise the Brazilians couldn’t deal with X either. This is far more than sending a letter. And pretending we have no jurisdiction over companies operating in our country is ridiculous.

              • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 天前

                Any real arguments for falling under jurisdiction for sending network packets? Does it have to be a company, or do you also have to abide by jurisdiction of the country I’m in? My server is in? Your server is in?

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 天前

                  This isn’t a joke. This is pretty settled law. If you’re offering services in a country you must abide by their laws.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 天前

        Funny how you had replied to a comment from me in another discussion explaining what that meant and now you’re acting like you had never seen that comment.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 天前

          When I ask that question I’m looking for a source point. Usually when multiple people show up on social media claiming something like this it means some podcaster somewhere put it out there.

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        18 天前

        So what keeps them to obey US laws?

        Ok, let me ask a different question. What can be done when a product from a foreign country doesn’t obey laws? Hint, it is happening on Sunday.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 天前

          What laws? We literally just passed a law to ban them. There wasn’t any law they were breaking before. This is the corporate version of Congress passing a bill to send you to prison.

          Saying this is the only regulation possible is breathtakingly ridiculous.