The plain and simple of it is that I’m not a good moderator. I have no idea what I’m doing. I wanted a community where people could post conservative stuff without it getting overwhelmed by lefty stuff, and then you could have discussions/arguments in the comment section. Bring to light stories that wouldn’t normally be seen on lemmy. Since that didn’t exist on lemmy, I had to do it myself.
Right now, there’s a lot of toxicity, some straight up telling people to kill themselves. My whole moderation policy was basically “So long as it isn’t a straight up slur, you could comment it”.
You’d think it’d be simple, just ban those who do that. Well, what about those who defend baby murder? I know lefties genuinely believe it isn’t, but I do. How do you tell what is horrible shit, when lefties act like horror movie monsters?
What about those who I’m like 90% sure are arguing in bad faith? I want to encourage discussions and arguments, and if I’m wrong, what then?
Me doing keyword-based moderating was a bad idea, but I am at a loss of how to do better, without breaking what this sub was supposed to be about.
I need ideas.
How should I moderate this community?
You can dislike what I’m saying all you want, it doesn’t change the fact that what I say is true.
Debunking conservative ideas and improving the sub are two different, partially inclusive things.
Now your changing what you said, you went from steering people away from this sub to debating conservative ideas.
That’s the same thing.
There’s the disingenuous argument I was after.
It’s not disingenuous. I genuinely believe those things to basically be the same thing.
If you did you wouldn’t keep changing your stance.
Then
Now
So which is it, partially inclusive, the same thing, or basically the same thing?
I said this was the same thing.
And this is partially inclusive.
You’re not keeping up.
So then by your latest logic steering people away from this sub will contribute to the improvement of this sub?
I’d love to here your examples.
This is a strawman.