Meanwhile my lonely ass been sitting over here absolutely loathing Fallout: New Vegas since its release. I did not like that game. I probably would today if I got over myself and tried playing it again.

  • Denjin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Fallout 3 is a post apocalyptic adventure game. New Vegas is a post post apocalyptic role playing game. I enjoyed the hell out of them both but largely for different reasons.

    • MuAraeOracle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I enjoyed New Vegas, I started on FO4 and it feels a bit meh i have’nt reached that far yet, maybe I should give FO3 a spin?

      • Denjin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Depends what you’re looking for, don’t play FO3 if you want a great main story, if you’re going in for the exploration and side quests, it’s a lot of fun with some great things to find.

      • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Fallout 4 is the worse Fallout 3, imo.

        The shooter gameplay is definitely better in 4, the crafting system is pretty neat too. The story is like a weird reversal of the Fallout 3 story, with stakes that don’t feel as real as Fallout 3.

        None of that matters, though. It’s a Bethesda game, and people don’t really play those for the main story. Here’s what really matters. The world of Fallout 3 is so dense, the side quests so memorable, that if you’re the type of player who loves seeing what’s over that next hill I think it would be a disservice to NOT recommend Fallout 3 to you.