• blakenong@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m not super concerned with “things” and their value. If a person makes $1b a year and wants to buy a $1b yacht every year then they have a bunch of yachts. The point is that money went back into the economy. Now, if they have 2 and want to sell 2 for $2b all at once… sorry, no. There is a wealth cap.

    The issue with Billionaires now is that money isn’t in the economy. The more they hold, the harder it is to get enough.

    Greed is a horrible thing.

    • lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think you have exactly the opposite impression of wealth than how it is in reality, then. Billionaires typically have only a tiny amount of their wealth in liquid funds (what you call “holding” money) - most of their wealth is in investments, and hence “in the economy”. So the thing you’re proposing already holds.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The issue with Billionaires now is that money isn’t in the economy.

      Again, the baseball card growing in value by $95 took $95 away from no one. No one is deprived of cash in their wallet as a result of another person’s purchase appreciating in value.

      Also, their net worth is not cash sitting in a vault, it’s investing into businesses that are running within the economy. It literally all is actively in the economy. You literally can’t become a billionaire without doing that. Saying/implying that billionaires “hoard” wealth is deeply ignorant.