The Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear a challenge to a federal ban on gun "bump stocks" in a case that could affect thousands of gun-owning Americans.
Nothing against your stance, the idiots advocating for bump stocks are fucking reeeeeeee-ally tarded. What the fuck could their argumment be in favor of where the same argument wouldn’t be more grounded advocating for fully automatic firearms? Bump stocks are a redneck engineering work around to not having the machining resources to modify a lower receiver to be automatic (waaaay over simplified that for a reason so fuck off anyone who elaborates on the how to and not the why not to)
Bump stocks are fascinating work around when you try it for the first time. BUT THATS IT lol. Once you shoot one once the amazment subsides and the cost of 100rds of steel or brass sitting on the ground sets in and the next time you wanna have 8 seconds of fun you think about the time to load 100rd drums, the cost to fill 100rd drums, the hassle of lugging around 100rd drums and last but furthest from least the potential penal repercussions that could stem from any one person within ~4mi radius of where you are shooting calls the cops regardless if you live in a state where they are/are not legal you’ll be answering questions.
Dont take this as me advocating for fully automatic firearms either. Im just saying any argument they present in favor of bump stocks would be more practical, safer and better to regulate if you made the same argument in favor of a fully automatic rifle. Bump stocks leave way too much room for user error compared to an OEM manufactured fully automatic firearm.
Bump stocks leave way too much room for user error compared to an OEM manufactured fully automatic firearm.
That is one reason I don’t mind them being banned. I don’t see a valid use case for one other than idiots being idiots. I do not see it infringing on any rights to ban a stupid accessory.
All my videos are not controlled automatic fire but spray ammo everywhere.
Can you do me a favor, can you edit your prior post and remove the R word. It is against lemm.ee rules
Nothing against your stance, the idiots advocating for bump stocks are fucking reeeeeeee-ally tarded. What the fuck could their argumment be in favor of where the same argument wouldn’t be more grounded advocating for fully automatic firearms? Bump stocks are a redneck engineering work around to not having the machining resources to modify a lower receiver to be automatic (waaaay over simplified that for a reason so fuck off anyone who elaborates on the how to and not the why not to)
Bump stocks are fascinating work around when you try it for the first time. BUT THATS IT lol. Once you shoot one once the amazment subsides and the cost of 100rds of steel or brass sitting on the ground sets in and the next time you wanna have 8 seconds of fun you think about the time to load 100rd drums, the cost to fill 100rd drums, the hassle of lugging around 100rd drums and last but furthest from least the potential penal repercussions that could stem from any one person within ~4mi radius of where you are shooting calls the cops regardless if you live in a state where they are/are not legal you’ll be answering questions.
Dont take this as me advocating for fully automatic firearms either. Im just saying any argument they present in favor of bump stocks would be more practical, safer and better to regulate if you made the same argument in favor of a fully automatic rifle. Bump stocks leave way too much room for user error compared to an OEM manufactured fully automatic firearm.
That is one reason I don’t mind them being banned. I don’t see a valid use case for one other than idiots being idiots. I do not see it infringing on any rights to ban a stupid accessory.
All my videos are not controlled automatic fire but spray ammo everywhere.
Can you do me a favor, can you edit your prior post and remove the R word. It is against lemm.ee rules
Removed, R1, No Slurs. If you want, you can repost the comment with the slur removed.