ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.28Karrow-down1imageWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square77linkfedilink
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·3 months agook, but what about three Youtube videos?
minus-squareMr Fish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·3 months agoAs long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 months agoThat makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoAre they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months ago Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody Is there any other kind?
minus-squareSlovene@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoMaybe, if they’re from potholer54
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoAll hail potholer54! The guy is awesome
ok, but what about three Youtube videos?
As long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
That makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
Is there any other kind?
Maybe, if they’re from potholer54
All hail potholer54! The guy is awesome