• ehpolitical@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Life is so full of slippery slopes, I can’t see how it’s just some logical fallacy. Addictions, infidelity, lying, cursing, etc. Once we start heading in certain directions, it’s typically very hard for us to stop and not keep going. Unfortunately, this group doesn’t appear to be one… cause it seems like a really good/interesting idea.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    First you begin by positing that “slippery slope” isn’t a fallacy, and before you know it, the camel is in the tent and eating your grapes.

    While I’m not concerned about camels eating MY grapes, it’s true that they’ll happily eat grapes if given the chance.

    Which side do you think is having their valid concerns dismissed? How do you know they’re valid?

    • John_McMurray@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Someone’s fishing for political opinions. Anyways, how I know if they’re valid or not is by considering their logic and likelihood, not just dismissing an opposing view as “slippery slope” and moving on.

        • John_McMurray@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m starting to feel like you’re exactly who I had in mind, knows the names of all the logical fallacies but lacks a real understanding of the concepts, just uses them as dismissive magic wands

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Ah, then you didn’t get what I was doing with my response.

            The thing about actual fallacies is that they are about flawed logic. If a fallacy is being used, that means the conclusion is not actually warranted by the evidence and logic.

            It says nothing about whether the conclusion is true, just that the path taken to arrive at the conclusion is flawed and not worthy of further consideration.

            So when someone names a fallacy to dismiss what someone is saying, they’re not arguing that the person’s stance is wrong and doesn’t deserve further consideration, they’re arguing that the person’s logic to arrive there is flawed and does not deserve further consideration.

            Slippery slope is a fallacy because it argues that if certain steps are taken, others will inevitably follow that wouldn’t follow if the first steps were never taken.

            So “it’s a slippery slope from playing violent video games to mass murdering your friends and family” is the fallacy; “it’s a slippery slope from taking fentanyl to becoming an addict” is not.