Florida police arrested a 27-year-old Jewish man, Mordechai Brafman, on suspicion of attempting to murder two men he believed were Palestinian. The victims were an Israeli father and son visiting from Israel.
According to investigators, Brafman overtook their car in Miami Beach, made a U-turn, exited his vehicle and fired 17 shots at them. Local authorities said Brafman didn’t know the victims and there was no prior confrontation between the sides.
Brafman drove home after the shooting and was arrested shortly after. He is charged with attempted murder. While police have not officially determined a motive, they said: “It should be noted that, while in custody in our interview room, the defendant spontaneously stated that while he was driving his truck, he saw two Palestinians and shot and killed both. The victims and the defendant do not know each other,” Police added that he told investigators he had killed them.
Brafman, a married plumber, was interviewed last year by Florida media after vandals targeted a Miami Beach bagel shop displaying an Israeli flag. “It’s just horrifying,” he said at the time. “I’d like to see more unity, for people to fight less with each other and be more together.”
I wonder if he’ll be tried as a terrorist. I feel like any other violent ideological act like this would be.
Weird way to spell pardoned
I think hate crime would be the most appropriate charge.
Those are both generally enhancements/reclassifications to a charge not charges in and of themselves. In Florida it’s “775.085 Evidencing prejudice while committing offense; reclassification.—”.
I think they may have said that because the state of Florida sought terrorism charges when a lady told a healthcare member they’d be next after the Luigi thing.
Which also seems like it’d fall more under hate, but hard to say.
That wouldn’t fall under the purview of hate-crime law I.M.O (disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer) because neither the intended nor the actual target was targeted on the basis of an identity category (ethnicity, gender, creed, race, religion, nationality). Not unless you include occupation as an identity. I don’t.
Yeah that makes sense, but I’d also not call a death threat terrorism if aimed at one person denying your health coverage. If a death threat is terrorism, then every assault / murder would have to be I’d think
Yeah and it wasn’t a super clear death threat. Definitely rude but I think terrorism is a clearly excessive charge. I don’t think it’s right to target individuals, especially lower level ones when it’s the corporate “entity” as a whole, especially the higher-ups at fault.
Oh was that in Florida? So much weird shit happening all the time I loose track
Idk I feel like if this had been a Muslim guy the charge would be very different but I’m no lawyer so maybe you’re right, either way it’s a fucked up story.