• WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Huh.

    I has nothing at all to do with that.

    In our current environment, I took “inseminated person” to be sort of a notably formal synonym for “cumdumps,” or maybe less crudely, “sperm receptacles.”

    It seems to deny the individual so labeled of any human qualities aside from the fact that they’ve been, in conservative christian terms, blessed with a man’s seed. The person described doesn’t even seem to the important person in the description. It’s more as if they’re a mere receptacle, and the person who did the inseminating is the one who actually matters.

    Self-evidently I should’ve read the article, but honestly it never struck me as even a possibility that such a dehumanizing phrase would actually be promoted as a progressive thing.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Yeah this is weird and creepy. What the hell was wrong with just making it a gender neutral “pregnant person?”

      Instead he made it about the fucking semen.

      Democrats just love fucking losing, fash media is going to have a field day.