• Black Xanthus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The comments on this post went exactly like they have over the past 20 years, with one exception.

    Emacs is all but forgoten.

    Vim wins.

    • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      Be real fukin careful now. You’ll tear my enacs from my cold dead hands

      (But yeah, I use evil-mode. Also I edit files on remote servers with vim. I’m a traitor…)

    • geoff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      When people are free to choose the best editor for them, we ALL win.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I think there’s a good reason for that. If you’re not as concerned about resource consumption (Emacs used to be called “Eight Megabytes and Constantly Swapping”, back when 8MB was a lot), then there’s no reason to avoid even more complex and resource intensive IDEs. People who wanted a complex editor, but in a relatively small footprint, stuck with some variant of vi.

      Thus, vi found a stable evolutionary niche. It’s a tardigrade.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Recently, I recommended to a friend that basic vim/vi is worth learning because it’s a baseline that you can always trust will be there across different Linux systems.

      They asked me what I used most on my home system, and the answer was emacs, but I was very clear that I was not recommending it. It’s a particular kind of person who finds themselves at home in emacs, and for everyone besides those people, selling them on emacs would feel like persuading them to do hard drugs.