• crackajack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is only so much that revolutions could do though. Attacking police and authorities because they attacked you for having peaceful protest? That’s reasonable, it is self-defence. But looting businesses and attacking properties? No. People love the French revolution and abolishing a corrupt regime, but not its subsequent Terror by the revolutionaries.

    • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I do it by myself I go to prison, my life is ruined, and nothing changes. If I get several thousand people to do it with me then several people go to prison, a few probably die, my odds are probably pretty good and things have a nonzero chance of being changed.

      Your 3rd grader conception of hypocrisy doesn’t apply here.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Eating breakfast won’t force change

      Brushing your teeth won’t, either

      Nor will telling your mother you love her

      Being an anarchist doesn’t mean every action you do has to be praxis

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did I say they were? I’m just saying you know literally one thing about them. You have zero evidence to prove anything else other than they made a comment here.

  • Jordan_U@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    ITT:

    Everyone thinking that the only two options are being quiet or being violent.

    Strikes are currently making those in power very uncomfortable, and are resulting in genuine progress for workers.

    In my area, people camping out in thousand year old trees has protected them time and again from being illegally logged.

    Black Lives Matter protests were loud and made the powerful uncomfortable, and despite media narratives it wasn’t “violent protesters” that made the powerful uncomfortable.

    It is true that any form of protest that is loud and inconveniencing enough to actually be productive will be met with state violence.

    It’s also true that some working for progress do use violence. But make no mistake, it’s not guns that made those in power uncomfortable when it came to Malcom X and the Black Panthers.

    The most radical and intimidating (to those in power) things the Black Panthers did were to give free food to schoolchildren, and free healthcare at their People’s Free Medical Clinics.

    Building community and mutual aid is subversive.

    Building community and mutual aid makes those in power uncomfortable.

    • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One of the most subversive things you can do IMO is move your life and wealth to China

      or get hired for a gubment job and slack off/sell seekrits

      if you can’t do those two, then comes the 5 finger discount and IRL minecraft

      IRL socialist networks need to be secretive and disguised as something else. Maybe even “community watch” or something

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Building community and mutual aid is subversive.

      This. Both the government and the major corporations depend on being able to extract wealth from real people getting what they need. If we build dual power structures, help one another out and cut the owner class out of the transaction entirely, we weaken them. Growing food in your garden is revolutionary. Clothing swaps are revolutionary. Cutting the old lady next door’s lawn, then eating the soup she made is an act that strikes at the fundamental underpinnings of the power structure set up by those who think that they should be entitled to our labor because they’ve been arbitrarily designated as the “owners” of things. We can and should remove them from the equation entirely.

    • SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Building community and mutual aid makes those in power uncomfortable.

      Small mutual aid for local communities grow out into large social aid organizations that have political power. Politicians can make them redundant by unemployment, healthcare and pensions, or try to nip them in the bud.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The entirety of history also shows that a whole lot of people need to be ready to die for the cause for social change to happen.

    So, still feeling up for it?

    • Promethiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Far more people than you seem to think so are feeling up to it, risk of bodily harm nonwithstanding. That same history shows that whole lots of people do and have gotten that fed up.

      The current challenge imo is the hyperfocused and extremely well funded tools to disorganize and fracture populaces globally.

      They are so abstract, so psychologically targeted and so pervasive that they enable the rise of fascism again even though many of the players are frankly cartoonishly inept (more so than in the past; fascism is cunning and bullish, but seldom clever) to the point that the banality of evil of yesterday is nearly preferable to the bumbling cruelty of today.

      Yes, still feeling up to it, but while the precipice nears, there’s still both time to turn the car around and get ready to violently brake. We’re just careful drivers until there’s a need to maneuver.

    • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the question:

      live in an unjust and amoral society

      or die trying to make a righteous one.

      The stoics, at least Seneca, opted for the former.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look at the US, they begged England for representation. Even after they gave an ultimatum they begged to stay but it didn’t work and they had a war that France won

  • D3FNC [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Anytime I hear people say dumb shit like this I just start listing all the times anti-abortion activists either successfully murdered or attempted to murder their political opponents in the name of the pro life movement. A hit list of judges, physicians, nuns, retired old ladies that like to knit, they absolutely didn’t give a single fuck about any of this struggle session bullshit wreckers like to trot out to sabotage effective resistance

    Then I end with the date Roe got overturned, but they still somehow cannot connect the dots and want to talk about registering new voters or some fucking bullshit

    My take home message is it turns out that when white people actually want something they magically know what effective forms of protest actually look like (???!)