Neat quote saw when reading. Admitting you’re wrong in a genuine way is something you see rarely these days.

“In a 2024 interview, he said he renounced his libertarianism as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic after a libertarian group asked him to speak at an anti-mask rally. “The fact they sent me this email is something I need to be very ashamed of, and I need to change” adding “Many times when I identified as Libertarian, people said to me, ‘It’s just rich white guys that don’t want to be told what to do,’ and I had a zillion answers to that — and now that seems 100 percent accurate.”[56]”

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    yeah before I knew about this I always liked him with an asterisk. he’s smart and entertaining, but he’s a libertarian. I couldn’t dislike him though because whenever he spoke he always seemed progressive, humble and empathetic, unlike libertarians. then I recently learned he denounced libertarianism. and now there’s no asterisk. I like the guy.

    also p&t have been hosting the best talent show for more than a decade.

  • tehmics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m really glad to see this.

    Penn Jillette played a big role in who I am today. Bullshit! helped shape my skepticism in my late teens, and I was fascinated with magic even earlier than that. I went on to adopt some libertarian views and listened to his podcast for years, but I grew away from him during COVID because I was seeing how his position was harming people. I always thought he was a smart respectable guy, so seeing him reflect and change is heartwarming.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’ve always had a lot of respect for Penn’s sincere “individual freedoms as long as they don’t infringe on the individual freedoms of others” brand of libertarinism that advocated still caring about other people, and isn’t about just deferring to corporations

    I’m not surprised he no longer identifies with libertarianism, given what it’s increasingly come to mean. I may not look at the world exactly the same as him or always agree with him but people with sincere principles always have my respect.

    The way he and Teller made a show to basically showcase other magicians is super cool. If you look up Penn & Teller: Fool Us on YouTube you’ll see tons of magicians publishing their segments on the show on their personal channels, which must mean Penn and Teller negotiated that performers would have rights to their own performances and can publish them themselves.

    Thats fucking cool. (Also a great show, it makes a great YouTube binge!)

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Anarchism is the better version of libertarianism. Left-anarchism gives all of the liberties but without capitalism. If only capitalist realists could get past that hurdle.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I need to learn more about anarchism as a political philosophy, I have little grasp of like, what it actually means in practice

          • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I can’t get behind anarchism because there will literally always be antisocial people seeking to hurt others, physically or not. Anarchism either ignores that reality or hopes those evil people willingly attend treatment programs that hopefully make them stop hurting others. Murder, rape, theft, war, etc.

            • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s not necessarily true, those people can be banished from a community or even violently resisted depending on your flavor.

              And even if you take your statement as fact, isn’t that a much easier problem to solve than what we’re dealing with now? Maybe some limited prisons for the worst offenders might be our only compromise

              • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Banished how? They can just re enter.

                Violently resisted how? Lynch mob?

                I agree that limited prisons is preferable to the current US system but you’ve essentially just reinvented government and police in all but name.

                • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  Positions of power like that in anarchist societies are usually held in rotation or fully democratically.

                  i gotta be honest with you, do you really think no anarchist philosopher ever thought of that?

                • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  not exactly, it’s not theoretical this is how stuff has worked before. someone can be banished from a society and become a persona non grata that can’t get support from anyone.

                  you’re acting as if something that’s actually in our history is unimaginable

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “‘But without religion, people would rape and murder all they want!’ I already do rape and murder all I want. And that number is ZERO, because I have no desire to rape and murder!” - Penn Jillette

    Also: When playing the Devil’s Advocate in the argument that vaccines cause autism, using the made up figures of the rate that supposedly happens, still showing how it’s more harmful to not vaccinate if only 1 out of every 10 people get autism, there’s still thousands of deaths caused by curable diseases from not vaccinating.

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very similar to my journey though no one asked me to speak anywhere and I had the privilege of being able to change my mind entirely out of the public eye.

    Much respect for this.

    • Noblesavage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      It takes a lot of strength to change what was probably a core part of your identity - I respect your change.

  • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Was libertarian in college. Realized that a key facet of libertarian thinking involves the ideas that “government is a necessary evil” and that “government exists to keep one person’s freedoms from infringing on another’s.” Which led me to consider that if it’s a necessary evil then government should work for the majority of people. Further, government’s “umpire” role should apply to the rich since their freedoms are often infringing on mine and others’ (and wealth is a form of power that needs its own checks).

    Anyway, I think I lean more toward communitarian politics nowadays.

    • JC1@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Libertarianism has roots in socialism. The term has been coopted by anarcho capitalists. You’re right with your analysis IMO. You can’t be free with authoritarian politics and/or authoritarian economy. Capitalism is very authoritarian.