No, but they’re not out there making the daily argument for the most active communities of the same name being the only communities of the same name.
I get that nuance is a thing, but maybe you are not the one to be the standard barer for this one, given how it conflicts with your very public lobbying for consolidation? I say this with kindness and respect, but it does make you come across as more controlling and manipulatuve than well intentioned.
the daily argument for the most active communities of the same name being the only communities of the same name.
Interesting how you think that’s what my instance is, when I have said multiple times that [email protected] and [email protected] should stay parallel communities.
![Created a new Ask community, [email protected]](https://i.imgflip.com/9n4mqx.jpg){kind=link}
No, but they’re not out there making the daily argument for the most active communities of the same name being the only communities of the same name.
I get that nuance is a thing, but maybe you are not the one to be the standard barer for this one, given how it conflicts with your very public lobbying for consolidation? I say this with kindness and respect, but it does make you come across as more controlling and manipulatuve than well intentioned.
Interesting how you think that’s what my instance is, when I have said multiple times that [email protected] and [email protected] should stay parallel communities.
Nuance, indeed