cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27088732
Generated Summary below:
Video Description:
On today’s episode, Brian and Prof. Richard Wolff discuss Trump’s demands that European countries double their military spending, and the new German government has embraced the open remilitarization of Germany–a major shift in policy for Germany since the defeat of Hitler and Nazism in 1945.
Professor Richard Wolff is an author & co-founder of the organization Democracy at Work. You can find his work at rdwolff.com.
#BreakThroughNews
Generated Summary:
Main Topic: The resurgence of German militarism and its implications for Europe and the world, particularly concerning the shift in the post-World War II power dynamic and its impact on social welfare programs.
Key Points:
- Post-WWII Deal: After WWII, the US provided military protection for European countries, allowing them to focus on social programs. This deal was mutually beneficial: the US boosted its military-industrial complex, while Europe enjoyed social welfare advancements.
- Deal’s Dissolution: The US’s declining global power and economic strain have led to the unraveling of this post-war deal. The US can no longer afford to solely shoulder the burden of European defense.
- European Remilitarization: European nations, particularly Germany, are increasing military spending, driven by pressure from the US and their own perceived need for self-defense. This is a significant shift in policy since the end of WWII.
- Social Welfare Cuts: Increased military spending will necessitate cuts to social programs in Europe, impacting areas like healthcare, education, and paid leave. This is presented as a direct trade-off between military spending and social welfare.
- Historical Context: The discussion heavily emphasizes the historical context of post-war Europe, the Cold War, and the role of the US in shaping European politics and social structures. The rise of communism and the US’s response are central to understanding the current situation.
- Nationalism vs. Cooperation: The video argues that the current situation highlights the limitations of European nationalism and its inability to foster cooperation, leading to a potential return to a fragmented and conflict-prone continent.
Highlights:
- The video uses the example of potential cuts to generous social programs in countries like France (five weeks of paid vacation) and the broader implications for social welfare across Europe.
- The discussion contrasts the social programs of the Soviet Union with those of capitalist Europe, highlighting the significant differences and the potential loss of European social advancements.
- The analysis emphasizes the hypocrisy of the US demanding increased European military spending, given the historical context of the post-WWII deal and the US’s own declining global influence.
- The video concludes with a somewhat pessimistic outlook on the future of Europe, predicting a return to internal squabbling and a decline in social welfare, while also acknowledging the historical significance of this shift.
About Channel:
At BreakThrough News we tell the untold stories of resistance from poor and working-class communities. At present, five corporations dominate the media landscape, including 90% of what we read, watch, listen to, and depend on for information about the world. Nowhere among the headlines do we hear the perspectives of working people and movements for social justice. Our mission is to break through the static, disinformation and fluff.
BreakThrough / BT Media Inc. is a nonprofit media and educational organization dedicated to independent, fact-based reporting and commentary on a diverse range of issues affecting the global movements for social justice. We are a recognized 501©3 nonprofit organization in the United States. To remain free of bias and preserve our editorial independence, we accept no corporate donations or state funding. Our funding derives from our viewers and readers, and foundations that support our mission.
This is basicaly a boomer tankie with a middle school level understanding of history going on a rant …
What kind of retort is that…?
Dismiss with name-calling so as to not think too much, then move on to something else…
We should put much more effort into things we don’t approve of when we don’t agree with them.
Especially when the video addresses specific issues and predicts certain results from these historical changes happening in Europe.
Here is the background of Professors Richard Wolff:
Richard D. Wolff is Professor of Economics Emeritus, University of Massachusetts, Amherst where he taught economics from 1973 to 2008. He is currently a Visiting Professor in the Graduate Program in International Affairs of the New School University, New York City.
Earlier he taught economics at Yale University (1967-1969) and at the City College of the City University of New York (1969-1973). In 1994, he was a Visiting Professor of Economics at the University of Paris (France), I (Sorbonne). Wolff was also regular lecturer at the Brecht Forum in New York City.
Prof Wolff is the co-founder of Democracy at Work and host of their nationally syndicated show Economic Update.[1]
Not really meant to be retort, just a general info/warning so other people don’t waste their time watching it.
Interesting…
Thanks for clarifying your disdain for the discussion, due to it being too low-level for your liking.
With no effort to point out examples of where you disagree or agree with the topics being discussed.
Again, an interesting way of interacting with posts you don’t agree with.
“Mhmmm Lack.”
Der Autor, vermutlich