ruford1976@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIf there was a religion of hate, do you think it should be allowed to be practiced?message-squaremessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareIf there was a religion of hate, do you think it should be allowed to be practiced?ruford1976@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareCaptainEffort@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI think anything is fine as long as they’re not hurting anyone. So if their hate is confined to themselves idc.
minus-squareruford1976@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agobut confined hate eventually spreads once it gains a significant following. so why allow it in the first place?
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoPunishing thought crimes?
minus-squareruford1976@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoReligions are irrationally unjustified. and irrationally unjustified hate is a danger to democracy and other people.
I think anything is fine as long as they’re not hurting anyone. So if their hate is confined to themselves idc.
but confined hate eventually spreads once it gains a significant following. so why allow it in the first place?
Punishing thought crimes?
Religions are irrationally unjustified. and irrationally unjustified hate is a danger to democracy and other people.