The administration officials gave Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic a front-row seat to the planning for the strike against the Houthis – a stunning intelligence leak that has caused anger against Republicans who called for criminal investigations against Hillary Clinton and others for playing fast and loose with sensitive information.
On the face of it, the strike against the Houthis had far more to do with the administration’s policies on protecting maritime trade and containing Iran than its concerns about Europe freeloading on US defense spending and military prowess.
But Vance appears determined to push that angle as a reason to postpone the strike.
“I think we are making a mistake,” wrote Vance, adding that while only 3% of US trade goes through the Suez canal, 40% of European trade does. “There is a real risk that the public doesn’t understand this or why it’s necessary,” he added. “The strongest reason to do this is, as [Trump] said, to send a message.”
Knowing their behavior in is consistent with their behavior in public is very valuable. It signifies their disdain towards Europe is not an act or negotiating tactic. They actually believe they are getting ripped off by the EU.
I’d argue that this is not private private behavior, but rather professional semi-public behavior. Vance in particular I’d think is rather adept at scheming.
I’m not saying it isn’t valuable - only that it isn’t surprising. With that said, leaking a private discussion which just coincidentally shows they’re not bluffing is awfully convenient…