• WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    What portion of the population do you think finds their job more fulfilling than the specific activities listed - let alone being able to spend your days as you please.

    …ohhhh - “We’ll make sure you can’t afford to do as you please, let alone survive, so you’ll have to work, but making sure the workers are responsible for it means we can keep our bullshit and economic vandalism up.”

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      My stepfather was a managing partner at an accounting firm. He got bought out by one of the big guys.

      4 months after retiring he started consulting. He doesn’t need the money, he needs something to do other than golf and he has no hobbies.

      The kids want him to travel etc but he’s happier working… which is fucked in my view.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        My father has retired multiple times. Then he keeps going out and finding new jobs like in real estate and making more money. My parents were very stingy with sharing, they spent all their money on random shit and properties that they’d then take a loss on. It’s really sad.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Within the confines of the neoliberal-capitalist societies most of us on Lemmy reside in, only the most privileged get to have a fulfilling and well paying occupation. Totally agree with you. My take on the peice is that it’s parodying the notion that you have to turn a hobby or unique skill into capital even well past retirement.

      I’ve always believed that people desire an ‘occupation’, just something to do with your time. Anything a person finds fulfilling to do. I also believe that we’ve confused occupation with payed work and now the two are perceived as the same. Or maybe I’m nuts.