• TeckFire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, to be fair, it is being fed data made by humans, so realistically its conclusions will be made likely following the ideas of past human inputs, no?

    And if those results are ideas that the creators would rather not progress with, shouldn’t they cull the outdated ones?

    I’m not speaking to any topics in particular, but the concept of AI creators shaping their creations. After all, if an AI told you the world was flat, wouldn’t you want to change its data to prevent it from producing results speaking so?

    • Warfarin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah feeding it facts and statistics

      shouldn’t they cull the outdated ones?

      No they shouldn’t at all. Do you not learn from mistakes or understand how propaganda works?

      . After all, if an AI told you the world was flat,

      It won’t, it is fed scientific data. Which is what the modern woke don’t like, it may mention that we used to think the world was flat and how we discovered that not to be the case and people can ask all sorts of questions and it should be able to answer but if we did what they are doing and what you want because being short sighted is popular, is that it won’t be able to answer why it isn’t, why we thought it was and how we came to the scientifically backed conclusion that it is round.

      That’s the problem with modern woke politics. It’s just “our way or you’re a bigotaistphobe” no learning or backing up claims just “this is our truth”