• macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Yes but they want to make money as well. It’s a conundrum they are too stupid to solve.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Hey, the US can still bid on EU arms programs, but we’ll have to put a 200% tarriff in to balance the trade, because that’s totally how it works.

        Wait, let me check with chatGPT to confirm.

        Yep, that’s how it works!

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 days ago

        Since war weapons are bought by the government with public money, putting tariffs on them doesn’t do anything. You can only make an effect with tariffs on purchases by private entities. In that sense the EU could put tariffs on weapon parts that European manufacturers buy from the US. I am not sure how big that market is though. AFAIK a lot of EU components end up in US weapons, for instance optics for military vehicles.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 days ago

            You could more easily exclude US products from tenders for security/strategic reasons. That is easier to achieve and more honest.