The context of this tweet makes it even worse. The tweet you posted is part of a tweet thread where Peter tries to argue that Epstein was not a pedophile.
Even without seeing that my first guess was dead on: they think it’s a vice, like just a little crime that special good boy rich white patriarchs can do as a treat, and are very, very invested in insisting that it’s not disordered and it doesn’t make them other and weird. Crimes against people they see as beneath them are just fun little treats that rich guys get to do as long as they don’t piss off the wrong people, but having something wrong with them? The very notion of it is deeply offensive to their fragile little egos.
Also gonna hit him on the semantic part here because why not but I remember seeing a documentary a long time ago about a rural village in an impoverished nation where girls were constantly developing incontinence issues and other long-term injuries because they were often giving birth at 14-15 and some anglo documentarian was saying how even waiting until they were 16 would have greatly reduced these rates because their bodies were too small and undeveloped ( ). So no Peter, 14-17 is not fucking “developed sexually”
![He just...casually admits it [CW: CSA]](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/86db1248-2585-401d-9f2c-6f248b23e1c9.jpeg){kind=link}
The context of this tweet makes it even worse. The tweet you posted is part of a tweet thread where Peter tries to argue that Epstein was not a pedophile.
Even without seeing that my first guess was dead on: they think it’s a vice, like just a little crime that special good boy rich white patriarchs can do as a treat, and are very, very invested in insisting that it’s not disordered and it doesn’t make them other and weird. Crimes against people they see as beneath them are just fun little treats that rich guys get to do as long as they don’t piss off the wrong people, but having something wrong with them? The very notion of it is deeply offensive to their fragile little egos.
Also gonna hit him on the semantic part here because why not but I remember seeing a documentary a long time ago about a rural village in an impoverished nation where girls were constantly developing incontinence issues and other long-term injuries because they were often giving birth at 14-15 and some anglo documentarian was saying how even waiting until they were 16 would have greatly reduced these rates because their bodies were too small and undeveloped (
). So no Peter, 14-17 is not fucking “developed sexually” 
If you feel the need to point out the difference between pedophilia and hebephilia you’re probably a pedophile.
If you do it because you just confessed to being a hebephile, you’re definitely a pedophile.
Teens are kids, you can’t change my mind.