Men do think about matters of the heart, but writing about it publicly could be seen as undignified, says journalist Imogen West-Knights

  • ChexMax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    But also, we’re not talking about dating, we’re talking about sex, and women are the definite underdogs when it comes to sex, or at least casual sex. The stats on who gets to orgasm through casual sex are just abysmal for heterosexual women… Maybe we all would benefit from sex columns for men more than we’d like to admit.

    The amount of false info around, " it’s just much harder for women to orgasm" and " a lot of women simply cannot orgasm no matter what" is pretty easily disproven by orgasm rates in homosexual female couples, which leads me to believe it’s the men in the equation that lead to women having trouble orgasming, not some inevitability.

    And this is all women are clear underdogs in sex before you even touch on the difference in dangers to men v women with sex /sexual violence/ coersion

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are you suggesting that those are valid reasons that “women [should be] allowed to denigrate men in print”? Because that’s the thing I was talking about.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why is that your sole data point here? What about amount of sex in general?

      Men have less sex in general and do it less frequently, so by that metric men are the underdogs.