Sludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoUS attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzexternal-linkmessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1439arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1434arrow-down1external-linkUS attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzSludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square50linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareAvg@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoBeen doing so for years, wouldn’t have gotten a degree without them so it’s only fair.
minus-squareBloomcole@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down27·2 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 day agoI went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out. What am I missing?
minus-squareTronBronson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 day agoNothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
minus-squarebluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 hours agoThe truth pretty much always is
minus-squareBloomcole@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoRemoved by mod
donate to wikipedia
Been doing so for years, wouldn’t have gotten a degree without them so it’s only fair.
Removed by mod
I went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out.
What am I missing?
Nothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
The truth pretty much always is
Removed by mod