Sludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前US attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzexternal-linkmessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1442arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1437arrow-down1external-linkUS attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzSludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前message-square50linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareAvg@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 天前Been doing so for years, wouldn’t have gotten a degree without them so it’s only fair.
minus-squareBloomcole@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down27·3 天前Removed by mod
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 天前I went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out. What am I missing?
minus-squareTronBronson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·2 天前Nothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
minus-squarebluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 天前The truth pretty much always is
minus-squareBloomcole@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 天前Removed by mod
donate to wikipedia
Been doing so for years, wouldn’t have gotten a degree without them so it’s only fair.
Removed by mod
I went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out.
What am I missing?
Nothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
The truth pretty much always is
Removed by mod