Without the immense load-bearing structure of the society-at-large giving buoyancy to their viewpoints the solid rock these people have instead of brains would pull them under and drown them like a vengeful god.
I’ve been coming back to this bit for years: the communist who gets to argue in bad faith like libs and republicans do because they live in a communist state
“You want to let a random asshole be your boss? What? So they can tell you when to wake up and when you’re allowed to take a shit? Why don’t you let them decide whether you get healthcare too. Matter of fact, let’s just let some random person to run the hospital too! They’ll charge you half a million dollars if you break your arm. No, I don’t think you understand, human nature is to work together. Your ‘competition’ society sounds good in practice until you have to actually make something useful.”
maybe bad faith isn’t the right term. But rather arguing with a certain lack of coherence, sequitur, and reference. Like arguing chauvinistically because of all the momentum of the super structure behind you.
Without the immense load-bearing structure of the society-at-large giving buoyancy to their viewpoints the solid rock these people have instead of brains would pull them under and drown them like a vengeful god.
I’ve been coming back to this bit for years: the communist who gets to argue in bad faith like libs and republicans do because they live in a communist state
“You want to let a random asshole be your boss? What? So they can tell you when to wake up and when you’re allowed to take a shit? Why don’t you let them decide whether you get healthcare too. Matter of fact, let’s just let some random person to run the hospital too! They’ll charge you half a million dollars if you break your arm. No, I don’t think you understand, human nature is to work together. Your ‘competition’ society sounds good in practice until you have to actually make something useful.”
You tried to construct bad faith argument, but you failed miserably. There is not even much hyperbole, just facts.
thank you
maybe bad faith isn’t the right term. But rather arguing with a certain lack of coherence, sequitur, and reference. Like arguing chauvinistically because of all the momentum of the super structure behind you.