• fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I mean, in fairness, do we have any qualms with the rest of the company? Elon was directly responsible for pretty much all of the cyber truck decisions. But the regular Tesla’s, aside from Elon prohibiting lidar and making false claims about self driving, are pretty decent. Without him, lidar might get implemented, the cyber truck will probably be scrapped, and real engineers will have their voices heard again.

    Isn’t that kind of what we want from a company? To realize their errors and remove the cancerous parts?

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Are you assuming Elon would no longer own stock or have other ways he’d continue to profit from Tesla?

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      He will still have a shitload of shares. I don’t need to get into the nitty-gritty detail of whether I hate the company or its products; his stock in it is what allowed him to buy the election for Trump, so fuck Tesla.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        But did Tesla facilitate that or was Tesla worn like a puppet by an investor(Elon). There’s a distinct difference and what I’m asking. Do we blame every company that gets gutted by Venture Capitalists? Do they have no path to redemption?

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      do we have any qualms with the rest of the company

      Let’s say they can him. Let’s say he is somehow compelled to sell off stock until he’s a minitority shareholder. His ego would not let that go. To say he’s still filthy fucking rich would do a disservice to filth. You can’t separate him from this mess. He’d just come back.

      If he just disappeared tomorrow, no chance of repurchasing it, just maybe but we need to see:

      • Unions everywhere
      • OSHA up their ass
      • Put some fucking LiDAR on the cars
      • Reinvent quality control
      • Reinvent a safety program so that people can’t burn to death locked in their car.
      • Fully support individual resale.
      • Fully support 3rd party service centers.
      • Every car is modified until it gets at least a three-star crash rating
      • All features are purchased with the car, if your seat has a heater, you can use it for free.
      • One feature is “we don’t sell” or “store your data in a way that can identify you”
      • Car updates are transparent and unless a true safety hazard, optional.
      • No more of this screwing around with odometers to speed past warranty availability and everyone gets 30k more miles and another year because they were assholes.
      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        not OP, I wouldn’t mind a redemption arc, they were pretty f’ing cool before he got there.

        Everything that was on the market before tesla was a facimilie of a thousand other cars before it. They did something (for better or worse) different. Learning what not to do has power in itself.

        After they took the leap, all of a sudden a lot of other companies started throwing out prototypes. I don’t think the Volt I drive today would have happened if they didn’t go there first.

        Of course things got a lot worse as Elon butted in further and they started pushing QC out and cybertruck BS in.

        I think they’re likely irredeemable, but I’d like to see another company follow in their footsteps and keep pushing the tech further, not in a garbage dumpster direction, but in a simpler and more effective direction.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Everything that was on the market before tesla was a facimilie of a thousand other cars before it.

          Dude, every one of their generic sedan looking business fleet cars look so bleh that they make a mid-90s Dodge Neon look like mind-blowing body design.

          The only thing they’ve produced in the last ten years that’s even markedly different from the competition is the cybertruck, and that’s only different in a bad way.

          The “innovations” they brought to market are almost all shit I would never need nor want save the EV part of it. I cannot imagine ever wanting to drive a thing in which much of the control and all of the gauges are on a permanently mounted, great value iPad.

          They are saying the resale value on these things is going through the floor, and honestly that’s good because that’s what they are worth.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Not talking about the body shape I could give a s*** less about that, matter of fact as places bring out different body shapes it kind of irrationally pisses me off. I’m talking about the design of the suspension and what they did with 360 camera coverage, how they handled the dual motors, The headlight emitters are actually multiple LED arrays and they can spell out shit in the headlights if they want to. All that crap was new and different. The only thing They really introduced that everyone else followed on and I hate is putting every blessed thing on a touch screen in the middle of the car.

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I didn’t know the headlight thing was one of their innovations. Yet another thing I can blame them for because driving in front of one of them at night is like a mild form of torture.

              I honestly don’t want innovation at all in my car personally. If Honda could make another edition of the electric Fit I would buy it immediately and drive it until it collapsed into dust.

    • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Tesla was garbage before Elon came out as a Nazi. The quality control is non existent and has been.

      • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yes, and that’s another reason the company is failing, and I won’t buy a car from them. But, that’s not the point here, the point is Musk’s stupid antics are having major consequences for him. The only value he’s had for the company for years is as a mascot. The company succeeded so far as it has in spite of Musk, not because of him. Same for SpaceX.

        • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          It’s literally the opposite. The company has only done well in the past because of his antics. Tesla currently has a price per earning ratio of 155. It’s only even this low because now people realize he’s a Nazi. In the past, I’ve seen their price per earning ratio go as high as 350. If you know anything about stock fundamentals, you’d know that a normal ratio is around 20-30. Anything under would be a must buy stock and anything over would be a must sell, generally but not always.

          But not Telsa. This isn’t the first quarter sales have been down for Telsa. In the past when it happened, Elon would just do something stupid like launch a car into space, make a small flame thrower, or do some stupid meme shit and the price would still go up, despite a bad earnings call.

          Since the first non roadster Telsa, they have been making shit quality cars and selling features as a subscription. If it wasn’t for captain dipshit doing stupid stuff and fooling people into thinking he’s smart, that company would have failed. Or he would have sold his portion back to the original owners and they company might have produced quality cars like the Roadster.

          • Kage520@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Not true. The company did well because of well meaning people who wanted to move away from gas cars. There was literally a documentary “who killed the electric car” before Tesla. It showcased a well loved electric car that was only allowed to be leased and when the lease was up, no one was allowed to buy them. They destroyed them all.

            Tesla got to where it is not because of Musk, but because it was a way to rise against the legacy manufacturers forcing us to stay on gas cars.

            Musk stirred up some major stupidity, and did not care for quality control when it came to things like panel alignment, but the fact was that was the only option out there. They also added cool things like your phone being a key, or the key card. Lots of little quality of life improvements were brought in. Also I think they had to make a special gel and position for the batteries to not cause fires from a single battery failure. Lots of important (yet likely relatively simple) improvements that all the other manufacturers refused to do. Best we had was a Prius, and other cars that were for some reason made to look ugly and still needed gas anyways.

            But they have stagnated. Musk has done all his tricks and they stopped improving. Literally letting the competitors make better batteries soon, which would kill them entirely if solid state batteries come about. I don’t know that Tesla can or needs to come back to the forefront, but without them we probably still would not have electric cars.

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Look man I get it, you bought a Tesla and/or hold Tesla stock. But Tesla’s value is only explainable as a meme stock, and Musk is the only one keeping it in that category.

              It wouldn’t shock me at all if the stock finally fell through the floor if they ousted Musk.

              The board and the shareholders agree about this btw, they just gave Musk an unbelievably large pay package last June.

              • Kage520@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Oh sorry I wasn’t trying to say that shouldn’t happen. The cars should be worth a bit less than they sell for, and the stock should be worth maybe 1/10th of it’s current value… Or less. I don’t care about that.

                We still needed SOMETHING to get us out of the rut from legacy manufacturers. Now if they get rid of Elon then hopefully the engineers who helped pioneer the current EVs can get back to moving things forward. Or maybe they work for Rivian or others already.

                • k0e3@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  There are plenty of competition in EV that’s non-legacy manufacturers. Even the legacy manufacturers themselves make better EVs than Teslas. So I don’t know what your concern is.

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Calling a company, which actively vendor-locks pretty much the whole car using their propiatery software while having the worst warranty ever, pretty decent is beyond me.

      Especially a company belonging to the car lobby.

      • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        To be fair, I think people get blinded by the fact that Elon is a massive twat, and miss all the other little bits.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They’re overvalued in the triple multiples compared to other American car companies because they’re a meme stock and halfway ran on government subsidies we paid for rather than putting it into education or social causes.

      A step in the right direction isn’t good enough when there’s miles to tread.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        A step in the right direction isn’t good enough when there’s miles to tread.

        So all or nothing? Then you’ll get nothing.

        • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Good, fuck em. There’s no negotiation here. I don’t care if the entire company goes under. What great service is Tesla providing? Not enough mobile beta-testers riding bombs down the rosd? They do nothing for the people supporting them.

          I guess a new company will have to rise up so entitled Californians can be tricked by marketing into thinking they’re saving the planet when the batteries were mined by gas-powered machines using the same poor brown folk they feel sorry for on Bluesky.

          Cry a river.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            At this point, it would be tempting to have all their employees quit and start their own EV company, or join another one. It’s not like the people vanish when a company folds.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              No one’s going to fund a new company though. The old car companies have finally moved to EVs and will quash newcomers. Funders know this.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Telo is getting funded.

                Aptera is doing another round of funding (for like the 7th time)

                Slate immediately got funded by Bezos.

                I think the market is pretty clear. People want cheaper, smaller, and more “every day” EVs, rather than the insanity 1.2 second 0-60 dystopian-proof luxury crossovers/trucks.

                The first company to make that happen in their niche is going to make bank.

                • someguy3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  Telo started 3 years ago, probably pitching for VC a year or 2 longer. Things have changed a lot in the last 4 to 5 years.

                  Aptera was founded 2019, originally 2006. And a trike? Not gonna be mass market.

                  Slate also started 3 years ago. When the visions of getting rich off EVs was still dancing in everyone’s head (not that bezos cares about that).

                  The business has moved. Smart money would not start a car company today without a competitive advantage like battery tech.

          • tankfox@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I’m pretty sure he means that there’s no point in trying to please you because you’ll always set a goalpost that can’t be reached, so there’s no point in really considering your opinion.

                  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 hours ago

                    What I find funny about this discussion is that the board is denying the reports that they’re even trying to replace him. People want to redeem this company based upon rumors of myths of games of telephone that they might have thought about making a good decision once.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think you’re probably giving a potential new CEO too much credit. You really think that Elon will just relinquish control over his company and let the CEO do whatever? Not a chance.