• Dragonstaff@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m not sure I understand you. Can you give an example of a conservative making a comment that pits one minority against the other that took the left out for a week?

    • LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “Trans athletes should not compete in competitive sports.”

      “Palestine is a terrorist state.”

      “Israel is committing genocide.”

      These aren’t really said by any one right wing taking head, in fact they work better if a “left wing” person says it; think Bill Mahr.

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It seems terribly dismissive to frame these as a result of right wing (or other) agitation. There are significant differences between people who want to throw trans people under the bus and those who don’t, etc.

        Sure, it must be nice for the right to be able to rally around whatever false talking points they gin up for the day. But when you have people who care about the truth, they will disagree sometimes.

        • LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The divisions aren’t a result of right wing bigotry, but they are exploited by right wing propagandists.

          What they actually do is frame all of these arguments without nuance. Then when corporate media goes with that framing you have reductivist talking points that bully out any reasonable debate.

          This is a superpower that the GOP has and the DNC cannot replicate with the current level of public discourse.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I see him more of a self defined ‘centrist’ that is fully on the right but just disguises himself when it suits the argument he’s having