• AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        azərbaycan dili
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Just like y2k, the irony is the problem is already solved but that won’t help us.

        Datetime types have long since converted to longer data types that will not have such a problem for thousands of years. APIs have long since converted to return those longer data types. The problem is solved.

        But the backward compatible 32bit datetime types are still there. Too many programs still use them. Too many embedded devices don’t include “extra features that waste space “, industrial devices are far more widespread but don’t get updates for many years. Worst of all, we have no idea what works and what doesn’t. We’re doomed to repeat the same crisis as y2k, where we’ll need to evaluate all our software, roll out patches, worry about everything falling down.

        Modern software development has made it easier than ever to keep everything up to date, to prevent so many issues from ever happening. Year 2038 is an unnecessary problem. But human nature is to let it fester until the problem erupts. We’re doomed

      • pie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s the same problem, though. “Oh no, we need to store 4 digits instead of 2” vs “Oh no, we need to store int64 instead of int32”. Or y’know, just use RFC3999 if you can’t do 64-bit. It’s a tedious lift, but it’s not a crisis. People that need to change will do.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You might read up on the everlasting prevalence of ancient COBOL still running too much of our banking and government. the same software that caused y2k is still there

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The problem is all the existing IoT devices etc that haven’t pre-planned for this. It’s a safe bet a lot of consumer devices with embedded systems haven’t planned for this and likely don’t have user friendly upgrade paths.

          • pie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I used to work at a major iot company. While, yeah, some devices will probably be left behind, most would’ve had this covered from the outset. The ones left behind were never intended to make it that long anyhow.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh we’re absolutely all going to die because there’s literally no way to move some businesses off software developed in the 1980s they’re addicted to it.