Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agoDefinition of rulesanitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up1188arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1183arrow-down1imageDefinition of rulesanitylemmy.worldUnruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square32linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareblitzen@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·1 day ago4 years is a long time, and what is true one cycle isn’t necessarily so the next. I’m not saying Harris is my preference for a democrat, only that a primary can sort it out.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·edit-222 hours ago a primary can sort it out No. The DNC run the primaries. They’ll just manufacture seeming consent for Harris or another Neoliberal stooge with policy positions far to the right of the people they’re supposed to represent. To the DNC, it’s still 1992 and it always will be.
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·18 hours agoClinton as the response to Reagan really did break the party.
4 years is a long time, and what is true one cycle isn’t necessarily so the next.
I’m not saying Harris is my preference for a democrat, only that a primary can sort it out.
No. The DNC run the primaries. They’ll just manufacture seeming consent for Harris or another Neoliberal stooge with policy positions far to the right of the people they’re supposed to represent.
To the DNC, it’s still 1992 and it always will be.
Clinton as the response to Reagan really did break the party.