The carbon capture company Climeworks only captures a fraction of the CO2 it promises its machines can capture. The company is failing to carbon offset the emissions resulting from its operations – which have grown rapidly in recent years.
They are not doing some “reverse energy consumption” (which would break at least 1 law of TD if successful) so as long as they don’t emit more co2 than they capture there are net benefits.
I wish them good luck when fighting the laws of thermodynamics.
Well it can be done, it’s not breaking the laws of thermodynamics.
Mhm. Using which energy sources?
They are not doing some “reverse energy consumption” (which would break at least 1 law of TD if successful) so as long as they don’t emit more co2 than they capture there are net benefits.
Common, it’s not that hard.
So where is the energy for capture and injection coming from?
Why are they unable to even negate their own footprint?
Ask them.
It’s more or less research. Hopefully they will optimise their energy usage.
I was trying to make you think but failed.
You’re just sealioning lol.
My bad. I thought I was just providing leading questions. Oh, well.