I disagree. As science goes, we must always remain open-minded, yet, the confirmation of a data point will only reinforce an assertion. An assertion such as, “There, still, is no evidence of the supernatural, such as a god or gods.”
And even if we found “something” we’d have to define it. Perhaps it’s just some very advanced, powerful alien like a Q that appears god-like? That doesn’t make it magic. That just makes it advanced beyond our current understanding, and that’s not the same thing.
Atheism is the lack of a belief in god/gods. Anti-theism is the opposition to organized religions and the problems/threats they present to individuals and societies.
You’re assuming a much higher probability for an outcome in your favor than is likely given the available data. While I find your enthusiasm for your hypothesis adorable, I do not share it. “An invisible, omnipotent sky wizard did it!” has never been the answer to any of the great mysteries of science.
I disagree. As science goes, we must always remain open-minded, yet, the confirmation of a data point will only reinforce an assertion. An assertion such as, “There, still, is no evidence of the supernatural, such as a god or gods.”
And even if we found “something” we’d have to define it. Perhaps it’s just some very advanced, powerful alien like a Q that appears god-like? That doesn’t make it magic. That just makes it advanced beyond our current understanding, and that’s not the same thing.
I mean I agree but the meme is still dumb.
Fair
It is not what op was talking about and this do feel anti-atheist
I’m what way?
In the way that the proof may come out at any minute like the rest of them.
Ehhh… proof of what? What ‘proof’ is it that you think might be forthcoming?
What do you think we are talking about ? god of course.
Atheism is the lack of a belief in god/gods. Anti-theism is the opposition to organized religions and the problems/threats they present to individuals and societies.
Bruh we were talking about this meme and this meme is what a theist argument will look like, that the proof could be discovered any day .
You’re assuming a much higher probability for an outcome in your favor than is likely given the available data. While I find your enthusiasm for your hypothesis adorable, I do not share it. “An invisible, omnipotent sky wizard did it!” has never been the answer to any of the great mysteries of science.