GNU Taler begins operating in Switzerland, distributed by the Taler Operations AG. Gnu Taler aims to be a “digital wallet” and has been used by the swiss national bank as well as the european national bank as a example for how a digital currency handed out by the state could work. It aims to be as privacy preserving as cash for the buyer while not allowing the seller to evade taxes.

Currently the Taler is brought out by a special organisation, the “Taler Operations AG”, and not the national bank, although both the national bank as well as the Taler Team have shown interest in a official digial currency by the national bank based on the Taler. But we need to relativate as the national council has stated that the introduction of a digital currency would probably take relatively major legislative changes and therefore take a bit of time.

  • demunted@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Digital currency without “blockchain”, say it ain’t so! This is why I think it might actually work. It’s not based on some kind of Rube Goldberg experiment to run the world power into nothingness.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Customers will use traditional money transfers to send money to a digital Exchange and in return receive (anonymized) digital cash. Customers can use this digital cash to anonymously pay Merchants. Merchants can redeem the digital cash for traditional money at the digital Exchange. As Merchants are not anonymous, they can be taxed, enabling income or sales taxes to be withheld by the state while providing anonymity for Customers.

        The digital exchange seems to be centralised.

        • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is even worse that the current system as it essentially means flat tax regardless of your income. This means a poor person is paying the same income tax through purchasing items at a store who will be on the hook for the taxes so naturally will pass on to you and at the same time a rich person will pay the same price and tax. Further since it is centralized all the same issues of corruption and exploitation exist even if the intent today is good.

            • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              as a contractor if the state could just transparently handle my sales tax that would greatly simplify my life/business/tax and greatly reduce the fear that im fucking it up somehow.

          • Ferk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The approach to taxing isn’t determined by this tool, but by the government. What this tool tries to prevent is hidden money exchanges, which affect both methods of taxing, not only flat taxes but also income-based taxes (since a hidden sale is giving the seller a hidden income and potentially placing them at a lower income tax class).

            • Paddy66@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It says “Payments are made after exchanging existing money into electronic money with the help of an Exchange service, that is, a payment service provider for Taler.”

              Do they say anywhere who that payment service provider is? And are there options for who to use?

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Its centralized you mean, and is at the whims of the creator. Like comparing a scarce asset like Pokémon card to gold

      • demunted@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        So the blockchain supporting $Trump makes it so much more trustworthy?

        • 3abas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Just because it’s built on a block chain doesn’t mean they relinquished control and decentralized it. But it’s a platform that allows you to decentralize.

          Is this worth it as an upgrade to our existing centrally controlled currency? That’s a different discussion.

          Does it solve the problem blockchain provides a solution for? Does it allow for decentralization? It appears the answer is no.

          • HenryBenry@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Does it solve the problem blockchain provides a solution for? Does it allow for decentralization? It appears the answer is no.

            And we are still waiting for a problem that blockchain can fix.

            • 3abas@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              If you don’t think centralized currency controlled by neo-liberal capitalist states isn’t a problem to solve, we aren’t even in the same plane here.

              • HenryBenry@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                And you think blockchain fixes that? Lol.

                Bitcoin is pretty fucking centralized right now.

                • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  It already did fix it. See OWS and wikileaks and the hong Kong protests.

                  All were able to get instant international donations from allies while the big banks shut down their donations (eg PayPal, swift, wechat, etc)

              • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Decentralized currencies will only actually make sense when the material incentives of our economic system would benefit from them. Capitalism is literally all about concentrating the control of capital and the means by which we produce things. Sadly, decentralized currencies will never be allowed to decouple themselves from these economic systems. There is too much material power to prevent that. And by material power I mean literally the enforcement of these concentrations of wealth through the use of violence.

                The tech is cool. But it doesn’t magically solve the problem by simply being invented. It’s why no one is actually paying with these cryptocurrencies on anything but an extremely small scale.

                A currency that cannot be manipulated by capitalist for their benefit has no place in our world. So, it will never reach any meaningful real use until those structures are dismantled. It will just continue to be a speculative asset that rich people dump their extra wealth into and poor people play as the lottery.

                • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yes I agree with this completely. Ethically-minded libertarian capitalists who have convinced themselves that bitcoin will neuter the ability of the state to commit violence are either fooling themselves or haven’t bothered to step back a bit to examine the nature of power. I was just pointing out that bitcoin does provide a way for a money to be managed in a decentralized and automated fashion. That’s the actual technological novelty that a blockchain enables, and IMO that is the only novelty is can or will provide. As all money does in capitalism though, yes it will continue top concentrate and cause harm.

                • HenryBenry@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  To your point, bitcoin is already centralized around 1% of wallets.

                  It’s not really decentralized when 1% of people control the value at will.

                  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    The data on these things is completely unreliable. Wallets are opened and dumped at will. I don’t think that you’re really wrong. It is likely very concentrated. But I know that there is no reliable way of actually coming to this statistic.

                  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    We’re referring to decentralized management, not decentralized distribution. Fortunately I don’t think anyone in this thread is pretending that any kind of money is going to make the world better.

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s like saying a HDD is bad because someone can put CP on it.

          Edit: CP rhymes with “Mild Corn”.

          • demunted@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nah it’s a shitty tech that everyone wants to make happen. It could completely disappear and the tech world.would be no worse off in any way at all. The world could do without it’s absurd draw on resources. And yes I am aware that the large power draw from mining is mostly gone. It’s idle resource usage is sad

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            A blockchain is a ledger. They’re talking about the distributed public ledger of all the histrionic transactions of the trump shitcoin