Lemmy Fans
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programming Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days ago

They're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.

lemmy.ml

message-square
10
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
1

They're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.

lemmy.ml

HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programming Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days ago
message-square
10
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    vibe coding (derogative)

  • BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    At first I thought “vibe-coding” was just writing code that felt useful at the time without having like design documents or a formal plan. Literally just coding based on vibes. And I thought it was nice that they finally recognized the way I have been writing code for the past ten years when all my bosses and managers haven’t.

    Imagine my disappointment when it turned out to be what it actually is.

  • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    We’ve seen functional programming, now get ready for dysfunctional programming

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Isn’t that just unstructured programming?

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      AKA whenever I write something in a strictly functional-only language and think I’m ready but I’m just way too used to object oriented to get it.

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Who’s they?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Teletubbies.

  • loaf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not my old ass over here cheering for functional coding… nope…

    … but yep.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Love functional coding. Depending on the use case it works really well.

      Wonder what return based is, sounds similar to functional.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Less of a paradigm but a way to write exploits but still more of a paradigm than vibe coding. It basically means “hey I can buffer overflow over the return address, let’s treat the program’s code as a VM to do what I want”.

Programming Humor@lemmy.world

programminghumor@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Related Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Other Programming Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2 users / day
  • 13 users / week
  • 40 users / month
  • 118 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 3.11K subscribers
  • 91 Posts
  • 459 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • 2e8a9d6bb6935a54@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org