• Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The thing is the human brain is very small and very efficient and has some limits on what it is made from being biological in nature.

    As the human brain exists we know it is possible to make. So if we make something as equally as functional then whatever we make we just make a new version 10 times as big.

    The problem is making that first artifical brain, but when we make that I don’t see how we couldn’t have an explosion in intelligence.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Which is why neural network computer science needs psychologists and sociologists to regulate it.

            It’s only a matter of time before corps start trying to simulate human brains, but even the smaller models deserve at least the same level of consideration that we give to animals.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Human brain is not very efficient. It just barely made efficient enough to start civilization - it did not have time to evolve within civilization to become more intelligent. Think about how more intelligent we would be if we were to continue evolving in the same direction of smart civilization builders for another million years.