• COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    And despite being designed to run on potatoes with a 2G connection it somehow felt just as smooth as modern mobile browsers (at least as I remember it). It’s crazy how well it worked considering the hardware and network limitations of the time.

    • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Didn’t opera cache images on their server and feed you a lower res version instead of what the website had? Granted with the limited bandwidth available back then, that was fine but now I don’t think many people would want that.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly this. Lower resolution and added compression. You could click to view full version if needed, but this was a feature as it meant faster loading and a small fraction of the data usage.

      • privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        In Opera Mini, yes. They also had a less popular but nearly identical browser, Opera Mobile, which didn’t do the proxying and compression. I had an unlimited data plan back then, so I always used Mobile. The performance was great even without compression.