Yeah, someone has to pay for it all - the WEALTHY people and corporations who benefit by the infrastructure. They get all the rewards of the system, but they expect someone else to pay to maintain it, too?
If they need to pay half of their fortunes to keep the other half, they’ll be just fine. If they refuse to cooperate, we’ll just take it all.
The wealthy have a choice for the next stage:
Trickle Up Economics, in which they’ll still end up with the money in the end, but it greases the economy along the way,
OR
Robin Hood Economics - Take from the rich and give to the poor. The problem with this one is that it will be VERY uncomfortable for the wealthy.
Yeah, someone has to pay for it all - the WEALTHY people and corporations who benefit by the infrastructure. They get all the rewards of the system, but they expect someone else to pay to maintain it, too?
If they need to pay half of their fortunes to keep the other half, they’ll be just fine. If they refuse to cooperate, we’ll just take it all.
The wealthy have a choice for the next stage:
Trickle Up Economics, in which they’ll still end up with the money in the end, but it greases the economy along the way,
OR
Robin Hood Economics - Take from the rich and give to the poor. The problem with this one is that it will be VERY uncomfortable for the wealthy.
I’m good with either one.