Fun meme and all, but I somehow doubt the author has much experience working with children. This is also a gross misrepresentation of ODD as defined by the DSM (emphasis mine):
A pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behavior, or vindictiveness lasting at least 6 months as evidenced by at least four symptoms of the following categories, and exhibited during interaction with at least one individual who is not a sibling:
Angry/Irritable Mood
Often loses temper
Is often touchy or easily annoyed
Is often angry and resentful
Argumentative/Defiant Behavior
Often argues with authority figures or, for children and adolescents, with adults
Often actively defies or refuses to comply with requests from authority figures or with rules
Often deliberately annoys others
Often blames others for his or her mistakes or misbehavior
Vindictiveness
Has been spiteful or vindictive at least twice within the past 6 months
There’s also qualifiers for frequency (they’re not pathologizing having a bad day or two). So no, your “eat the rich” and “ACAB” laptop stickers are not going to get you slapped with an ODD diagnosis.
Fun meme and all, but I somehow doubt the author has much experience working with children. This is also a gross misrepresentation of ODD as defined by the DSM (emphasis mine):
A pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behavior, or vindictiveness lasting at least 6 months as evidenced by at least four symptoms of the following categories, and exhibited during interaction with at least one individual who is not a sibling:
Angry/Irritable Mood
Argumentative/Defiant Behavior
Vindictiveness
There’s also qualifiers for frequency (they’re not pathologizing having a bad day or two). So no, your “eat the rich” and “ACAB” laptop stickers are not going to get you slapped with an ODD diagnosis.
I like that it specifies “interaction with at least one individual who is not a sibling”
The sibling might deserve it. You never know.