Came across this interesting article. But what do you all think?

  • mark@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t this effectively mark all messages from a user who isn’t using JavaScript as spam? 🙃

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Additionally, any spam tools could end run around this with Selenium and a sleep. idk if that would introduce enough of a delay to make running the spam campaign not worth it, since you wouldn’t really know what sites have the form delay you’d have to sleep on all of them for whatever time delay you think is worth it for maximum coverage.

      This is a super interesting defense in depth strategy that i’d never thought of before though.

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently the rate of users not using JS is about 0.2% (and has been that way for 10 years), so just applying this solution the the large margins as he’s doing, I’d probably just make an alternate message saying “please enable javascript to contact me” and let that be that.

      • mark@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Eh. These sorts of metrics aren’t always accurate. And the source company did the study in 2016, which was a very very different internet, and doesn’t go into detail about how they were able to determine this number. I would take that with a grain of salt. I agree that just having a notice somewhere is better than not, though.