• Nommer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    she later told me that I was anti-authoritarian and more likely to do what I thought was right rather than what I had been instructed to do. I am still baffled to this day about how that is an undesirable attribute

    It isn’t unless you’re a corporation trying to keep employees down.

  • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    "When we decided to give the test to the development team (about 15 developers) — most of them got scores that were lower than our threshold (45%), despite them all being rock-solid developers. Also, there were some candidates who managed to get 95% and above — but would then just be absolutely awful during the interview — we would later discover that they were paying someone to complete the technical test on their behalf.

    There is no substitute for taking the time to sit down and talk to someone."

    That’s pretty good advice. Interesting read.

  • doeknius_gloek@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    A lot of other people who took the test got largely the same result as when they joined the company — my results had worsened (by the HR Manager’s standards) — she later told me that I was anti-authoritarian and more likely to do what I thought was right rather than what I had been instructed to do. […]

    She mentioned that my chances of securing the job upon re-interviewing at the company were slim due to my psychometric profile.

    What a nice thing to say to one of your senior employees. HR people really are something else. They could’ve easily lost him that day because of some random bullshit.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    One of the first things I did when I lead my department was tell HR that I want veto power to anybody they added to my team.

    Rejected. They said they need to be in the loop.

    I then said I want the power to help filter applications.

    Rejected. They didn’t want me to feel “burdened”, and even when I said it’s important, they rejected.

    I went to the CTO to hire a handful engineers without HR approval. I needed them for a specific project, and going through HR would take weeks. He approved and we went above HR’s stupid hiring process.

    It’s a endless battle against HR.

    • signor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re just trying to validate their position…by creating boatloads of bureaucracy.

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ugh? Are you implying that every white person is a native English speaker, that non whites cannot be, or that they are unable to learn the language? Honestly your comment doesn’t reflect good on you

      Now don’t misunderstand me, those personality tests are bullshit and HR is to employees what police are to citizens, but your take is bizarre to say the least