• keepthepace@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is indeed a good example. You literally just give it squares to fill with whatever the model feels makes sense and as a result you have christian looking fresco probably very far from the likely reconstructions archaeologists would produce (the red parts were likely totally red, without characters in them).

    I feel that applied like that it is closer to misinformation than enhancement.

    • lanolinoil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, not exactly again – The original image is passed to GPT4 vision along with the article title and the image’s description, so it’s attempting to be contextual in its prompts and contextual to the shapes in the original image.

        • lanolinoil@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am pleased with it and its potential, especially for a v1. It’s OK that you don’t feel the same way.

          • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ah sorry, I did not realize you were the author, I would have been less brutal. Then let me rephrase my criticism: I think it is unproductive to show reconstruction of statues or painting of archaeological interest. Maybe showcase it more on enhancement of black and ,white pictures or sci fi illustration ?