• TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wild that you can base a whole case on what a photo AI thinks it is seeing. These programs at the very least should work like DNA or fingerprint matching and provide a percentage of its accuracy, not just that it finds some kinda close image in its database and everyone rolls with it. And it should need some other piece of evidence as well to back it up, it should never be the “best” part of a prosecutors case.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      With most digital forensic tools thats exactly what they do. There’s a specific threshold that gives a match probability. It’s designed as a way to point someone in a direction, not to confirm identity.

      I can totally see cops using this as probable cause but it would get totally laughed out of a courtroom.