cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/29825277

By popular demand, one last map to examine the absurdity of the American economy.

If you saw my map from yesterday that was up most of the day, please see the corrected version below. I done goofed hard on copying a column of state names. The original post has been corrected, but I will also post my previous two maps on this post for easy comparison.

Edit: the red map, for anyone unaware, is based on current individual state minimum wages and not the current federal minimum wage

  • jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    How are you accounting for cities pulling up the averages for each state? For example New York has some dirt cheap places to live, but it’s clearly being dragged up by New York City.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      You’d be surprised how few people live in NYC currently as compared to years before. It’s becoming a ghost town of the ultra wealthy and dwindling services and space for anyone else

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    At first glance that top map already looked bad, but then I zoomed in on the legend and the cutoff for the white areas is an annual deficit of 60.000 … What a ridiculous scale, that entire map should be blood red.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Any rational perspective on current wealth inequality is naturally shocking

      And people avoid shocking things

      The only way to get traction is to kind of pretend things are halfway normal

      The reasonable, rational people who are absolutely freaked out by the French Revolution levels of wealth inequality are marginalized and sidelined and told they are overreacting

      FOR THREE FUCKING DECADES

      Fathers with hungry children will be in the streets before the end of summer

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I’m pretty sure the cost of living numbers are for a household, not an individual.

    So unless we’re looking to get back to single income households, the min wage should be divided by two.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      No, these are using the cost of living numbers for an individual. Cost of living for a family of four is over 2x higher by their same calculations.

      So for two individuals making $35 an hour they would be close to affording comfortable cost of living in the cheapest state. Or it we were to make it equivalent to one individual’s income being enough for a family, they would need to be earning like 80 an hour

      As I showed in my longer comment, this would make the modern minimum needed to afford average COL raising a family equivalent to a top tier income in 1958. Basically unless someone was a 1%er in 1958 they wouldnt be able to live comfortably today. That is how unsustainably far down our wages have stagnated. 47% of households make less than what it costs for one individual to live comfortably. The median income today might be at a roughly equivalent point when adjusting for inflation, but it is brutally low in comparison to what one can actually buy with what that same value of money bought someone in 1958