I’ll note that right now, this is a seasonal issue, associated with moderate springtime temperatures when there is a lot of sunshine available.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They keep it in line by curtailing or switching off generation. The generator typically still gets paid as if it were generating whatever it has available, which is perhaps an issue, but the total generation is reduced to meet the demand.

    This is why there is negative pricing, it’s cheaper to sell electricity in the negative than to pay a generator to be offline.

    They can’t direct excess generation to batteries if the batteries aren’t there yet. They’re being installed, but the overall capacity is still relatively low. Transferring it to other grids also has limits, and in particular if there’s an excess of solar in one region the neighbouring regions also probably have an excess, so there really is no other option but to curtail.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Jeeze it almost seems like the 21st century might take some sort of smart grid, and having a bunch of big dumb plants that cannot be turned on and off without great expense should be a relic of the past!

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is a cost to that. Everyone complains about that.

        That’s why for example China are building new coal plants. The new ones turn on and off quicker.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Batteries” don’t need to be what we commonly think of as storing electricity. They can very much be a different way of storing energy instead. For instance, pumping water up to a tower (or upstream), or splitting water into hydrogen + oxygen (for consumption/combustion later)