Homo sapiens has evolved to reproduce exponentially, expand geographically, and consume all available resources. For most of humanity’s evolutionary history, such expansionist tendencies have been countered by negative feedback. However, the scientific revolution and the use of fossil fuels reduced many forms of negative feedback, enabling us to realize our full potential for exponential growth. This natural capacity is being reinforced by growth-oriented neoliberal economics

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    As might be expected, many economists and techno-optimists roundly rejected this assessment

    Nordhaus surley leads this group of asshats.

    https://theintercept.com/2023/10/29/william-nordhaus-climate-economics/

    Ignorance of systems has its way of plowing forward, juggernaut-like. Nordhaus has opined that agriculture is “the part of the economy that is sensitive to climate change,” but because it accounts for just 3 percent of national output, climate disruption of food production cannot produce a “very large effect on the U.S. economy.” It is unfortunate for his calculations that agriculture is the foundation on which the other 97 percent of GDP depends. Without food — strange that one needs to reiterate this — there is no economy, no society, no civilization. Yet Nordhaus treats agriculture as indifferently fungible.

    This crude mess of a model is what won him the Nobel. “

    • maketotaldestr0i@lemm.eeM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      the nobel in economics is just a fake award of other pseudoscientists tugging each others dicks.

      There are plenty of absolutely damning counterarguments to nordhaus that make it so that nobody serious takes him seriously. hes a shill plain and simple