• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I hope the rest of Europe gets the same message and doesn’t say “we’ll dump Microsoft for Malus”, just like they said “we’ll kick Twitter for Bluesky”.

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    What about the security implications to all the Linux users? If the EU switches to Linux, it’s suddenly going to become a significantly larger target for hackers and virus programmers. So far, we’ve been kinda flying under the radar, but that could change.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Since most servers are running some version of *Nix, its already happening. Just with more eyes on the code.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Most of the internet, huge portions of the world’s servers run on Linux. It has had a huge bullseye on it for a long, long time.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I have worked in several large organizations with over 10,000 enployees and if needed you can tighten Linux systems to be really safe - one of the largest customers of Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the US Military.

      Linux has still some large advantages. On Windows systems, the boundary between “executable code that is part if the system” and “untrusted data and documents coming from the network” is constantly blurred. This is not a good thing. Linux keeps that boundary, and thus makes it much safer.

      Also the unholy amount of sensitive and confidential data that is squirreled away by the Windows OS. How can e.g. Engineering companies even tolerate that?

      And one aspect which enterprises put wayy to little concern in - the US cloud systems are all pure attention suckers. Notifucations, Messages, Updates, News - all this costs a lot of precious time and even more of precious attention. It is not just smart phones, also Windows is infested with principles of addictive design.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Reminder that a lot of linux is American based. How long before linux itself gets targetted by the American regime?

        Also a lot of the little program bees that make up your favorite linux distros are hosted on github, Microsoft owned.

        Your options for a normal person’s desktop are a fork of Mint (Ireland), OpenSuSE (Germany), or Ubuntu (UK?).

        • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Also a lot of the little program bees that make up your favorite linux distros are hosted on github, Microsoft owned

          Not a good idea, but github is based on git, and git is completely decentral, a developer can move or backup his or her code in minutes.

          For example to a FLOSS site hosted in Germany, Codeberg.

          How long before linux itself gets targetted by the American regime?

          Linux as a project can’t be taken hostage, that would be like trying to imprison the ocean. But open source developers can, and sadly I think this is what is going to happen: While there are certainly a few nutjobs, I think the general goals of the open source movement are just totally incompatible with the authoritarian drift of current US politics - the GNU Manifest is pretty much a child of the American Civil Rights movement. It may well happen that in the next decade, many sweet American People will need our help and protection as much as people from other parts of the world have needed since the World War.

          • setsubyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I think in the future, it is advisable to use larger distributions where a lot of eyes look at, like Debian.

            This reminds me of the time when Debian broke their OpenSSL and for two years, ssh keys generated on Debian were basically taken from a pool of only 32k different keys…

            That time it was an honest mistake, but it would actually have been a very efficient attack too if it had been intentional. Imagine succeeding at getting your target to use private keys for ssh or ssl etc. from a tiny pool that makes something usually impossible to brute force suddenly trivial. And nobody noticed it for two years.

            • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Well, in the case of closed-source software, you can be dead-sure it is already subverted. As are probably most networks.

              In general, I think Linux’ many-eyes principle works quite well, just think in the case of the xz-utils backdoor which was caught before it reached large distributions.

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Being the Linux newbie I am, I still have to wait until 2028 until I can celebrate 30 years of my personal Linux desktop :)